External Critiques of Experimental Philosophy : Foreword(<Special Section>External Critiques of Experimental Philosophy)
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Experimental philosophy.
Experimental philosophy is a new interdisciplinary field that uses methods normally associated with psychology to investigate questions normally associated with philosophy. The present review focuses on research in experimental philosophy on four central questions. First, why is it that people's moral judgments appear to influence their intuitions about seemingly nonmoral questions? Second, do ...
متن کاملExperimental Philosophy of Science
Experimental philosophy of science gathers empirical data on how key scientific concepts are understood by particular scientific communities. In this paper we briefly describe two recent studies in experimental philosophy of biology, one investigating the concept of the gene, the other the concept of innateness. The use of experimental methods reveals facts about these concepts that would not b...
متن کاملExperimental Philosophy of Pain
The standard view of pains among philosophers today holds that their existence consists in being experienced, such that there can be no unfelt pains or pain hallucinations. The typical line of support offered for this view is that it corresponds with the ordinary or commonsense conception of pain. Despite this, a growing body of evidence from experimental philosophers indicates that the ordinar...
متن کاملThe ” EXPERIMENTAL PHILOSOPHY ” :
One of the most remarkable products of the reaction against Aristotelian philosophy, in the form that was handed down by late Mediaeval philosophers, was the rise of an entirely new philosophical system which came to be called ’Empiricism”. This was particularly associated with British philosophers, and was both instrumental in the rise of modern science, and a by-product of it. Its first major...
متن کاملPhilosophical Criticisms of Experimental Philosophy
The philosophical relevance of experimental psychology is hard to dispute. Much more controversial is the so-called negative program’s critique of armchair philosophical methodology, in particular the reliance on ‘intuitions’ about thought experiments. This chapter responds to that critique. It argues that, since the negative program has been forced to extend the category of intuition to ordina...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Annals of the Japan Association for Philosophy of Science
سال: 2015
ISSN: 0453-0691,1884-1228
DOI: 10.4288/jafpos.23.0_19